An association of industry supporters and oil and gas leaders has entirely bankrolled an independent expenditure committee spending tens of thousands of dollars to influence the Greeley City board race, current project finance disclosures have revealed.The independent expense committee, Greeley for a More Powerful Economy, has spent $80,897 up until now on the Greeley City board race, supporting four candidates with online advertising, robo-calls and exactly what’s thought to be the very first tv ad in Greeley municipal election history.For all of that spending, the group noted just one contribution in its Friday filings: Essential for Colorado. The 501(c )(4 )nonprofit isn’t required to reveal its own donors, meaning the bulk of costs on city council projects has can be found in the kind of dark cash.
But the group’s site is quite clear about its interests.Its board is the home of representatives from the Colorado Oil and Gas Association, the Colorado Association of Mineral Rights Owners, the Colorado Association of Commerce and Industry and numerous chambers of commerce.Recommended Stories For You In a prepared statement sent out to The Tribune on Friday, Essential for Colorado Chairman Peter Moore discussed the group’s interest in the Greeley City Council race:”Essential for Colorado is a union of business leaders, public officials and
regular residents who are committed to keeping a pro-business climate in our state,”Moore said.”For many years, local neighborhoods in Colorado have been targeted by anti-business groups with unlawful tally measures, recalls and other dissentious political methods. Pro-business candidates and pro-business citizens are up against the regional chapters of Sierra Club, League of Conservation Voters, Indivisible and other national activist groups, in addition to multimillionaire Stone Congressman Jared Polis, a huge donor to dark-money groups. “Both contributions to those prospects, along with those candidates’costs, pales in comparison to the cash funneled into the race through the Denver-based independent expenditure committee, Greeley for a More powerful Economy.The committee has actually raised$100,000, more than each of the 11 candidates for various Greeley City board seats have actually raised combined.It has invested $80,000, compared with the$38,000 in overall costs by all Greeley City board candidates.Although Important for Colorado is not required to note its contributions, some companies that have actually added to the group have taken actions to
list their own contributions.Anadarko Petroleum Corp., for example, lists contributions on its website of$ 107,000 to Vital for Colorado in 2016. Noble Energy also provided big to Vital for Colorado in 2016, contributing $157,988, according to the company’s filings on its website.It’s not clear precisely how the
committee set about choosing prospects to support, although those 4 prospects do share some donors, including Greeley Mayor Tom Norton, who appears on the Important for
Colorado website with a quote about the importance of energy. Norton has actually not contributed to Mirick’s campaign, but he has contributed$ 500 each to Fitzsimmons, Payton and Gates.In Mirick, the group is supporting a candidate who was on the Greeley
Planning Commission that turned down an oil and gas job in west Greeley. It’s also supporting a candidate with concerns about a possible felony conviction in his past, The Tribune revealed Saturday. The committee, Greeley for a Stronger
Economy, did not immediately react to questions about how it chose prospects to support.Suniga. has gotten in touch with Mirick to drop out of the race, and she utilized the case to attack Greeley for a More Powerful Economy.”This news exposes that this Greeley for a Stronger Economy does not really care or understand exactly what benefits company or great for Greeley,”Suniga said.”They’re not even trying to vet their prospects.”After a second round of mailers, the ones featuring Suniga, Longwell and Vetesy on puppet strings, a few of the prospects getting assistance from the Denver-based committee have actually expressed discouragement. Fitzsimmons, for instance, wondered whether the negative marketing in support of his candidacy may do more damage than good.The candidates are not allowed to collaborate with an independent expense committee like Greeley for a More Powerful Economy, and all four being supported by the committee have actually rejected understanding of who is behind the group.– Tyler
Silvy covers government and politics for The Greeley Tribune. Reach him at [email protected]!.?.!. Get in touch with him at Facebook.com/ TylerSilvy or @TylerSilvy on Twitter.Here’s a breakdown of the total amount raised and invested by each prospect in the Greeley City board race.More Roads for Greeley, a concern committee supporting Ballot Concern 2K, which asks voters to let the city keep about $1 million
in additional revenue from a voter-approved 0.65 percent sales tax boost for roadway construction, still has a lot of cash on hand.The group has actually raised$32,045, with the bulk of that money originating from road building and construction and related business. The group has invested$18,044.83. Picture illustration by Kristy Passard/[email protected]|Independent expenditure committee Greeley for a More powerful Economy has actually releaseda television advertisement targeting Greeley audiences and urging voters to support four particular
prospects. The ad includes a controlled reproduction of a Greeley Tribune story.Here’s a breakdown of the total amount raised and spent by each candidate in the Greeley City Council race.More Roadways for Greeley, an issue committee supporting Tally Question 2K, which asks voters to let the city keep about$1 million in extra profits from a voter-approved 0.65 percent sales tax increase for roadway building, still has lots of money on hand.The group has raised$ 32,045, with the bulk of that money coming from roadway building and construction and related business. The group has actually invested$18,044.83.